When it's before Yom Tov, especially a "3 day Yom Tov," and there is so much food prepared, so many bottles of drinks, so much challa, so many containers to store away, and it looks impossible to fit everything into the fridge and freezer, I've said - this is good! True, it's hard to arrange it all, but that's because there is so much food and that's good!
I read an article in which the author gives this type of scenario a good descriptive phrase. Peshie Needleman calls it, "annoyingly wonderful." The examples she gives are of her toddler who is up way too late, just not falling asleep, and she is frustrated until she thinks about how he recently had a virus and was lethargic and napping a lot. When he was better and full of energy too late in the evening, it was annoying but wonderful too.
She says "annoyingly wonderful" are those things that are annoying, frustrating but come from brachos like having children and a spouse and a house and an abundance of food, so they are wonderful. "Blessing-based annoyances should not be taken too seriously," she says, and she's right.
Dec 8, 2016
Dec 4, 2016
Rebbe's Message Re-Packaged
I listened to Rabbi Yitzchak Sorotzkin's address at the Aguda Convention and it was quite astonishing. His two main points were: 1) we cannot be satisfied with our personal growth, it needs to bother us that Yidden out there are not aware of Torah and mitzvos, we need to follow Avrohom Avinu and reach out, Avrohom was loved by Hashem because he increased kvod shomayim in the world, he did not just look out for himself, when we know how many children don't know what a Gemara is how can we be complacent? Did we do everything we could to get them to recognize there is a G-d and bring them closer to Him? and 2) the chilul Hashem in the world should bother us, we should be asking for the Geula wholeheartedly and if we did, it would come already.
If not for the Litvishe world's jargon and way of putting things, I would have thought he was a representative of Chabad, conveying the Lubavitcher Rebbe's message!
Nov 30, 2016
Cultivating Emuna
In a discussion, someone said about emuna that knowing that we are maaminim doesn't help him. It's a concept, not a reality to him.
Which led to the question - do we cultivate emuna or generate emuna?
Cultivate would mean to develop what is already there. To generate would mean to produce it when it wasn't there before.
I was surprised he said what he said. I think we think differently about emuna if we know it's inherent, and not something external that we have to acquire. If I had some way of knowing about a latent talent that I have, for music or art or anything else, I would try to cultivate it! If I had some way of knowing that I had no ability in a certain area, I wouldn't put my efforts in that direction.
We are told that we are "believers, children of believers." That's who we are. Emuna is not extraneous to us. It's right here.
Which led to the question - do we cultivate emuna or generate emuna?
Cultivate would mean to develop what is already there. To generate would mean to produce it when it wasn't there before.
I was surprised he said what he said. I think we think differently about emuna if we know it's inherent, and not something external that we have to acquire. If I had some way of knowing about a latent talent that I have, for music or art or anything else, I would try to cultivate it! If I had some way of knowing that I had no ability in a certain area, I wouldn't put my efforts in that direction.
We are told that we are "believers, children of believers." That's who we are. Emuna is not extraneous to us. It's right here.
Nov 29, 2016
Kiddush Hashem
This post is for links to two recent Kiddush Hashem news items. The first one you may have seen, since it has been posted many places. The second is not as well known.
What I like about the first one is that it wasn't even an extraordinary act that made the Kiddush Hashem. It was Jews doing what Jews do, in daily life. Numerous Jews live this way. We don't always realize how our Jewish routines make an impact, not only in the spiritual realms, but right here.
What's nice about the second one is the breaking of stereotypes.
Sometimes, a Kiddush Hashem is made when Jews return money that does not belong to them. True, it's a Kiddush Hashem, but non-Jews also return money that does not belong to them. These two stories are special because it is the very Jewishness of the protagonists that make it a Kiddush Hashem.
Nov 28, 2016
OTD in Yerushalayim
In a Binah magazine interview with Rebbetzin Chana Weinberg, of the Slonimer family, a 7th generation Yerushalmi, a descendent of the Boruch Taam, a Baharan* einikel, I read a shocking thing.
She said that after World War II, when she was in fifth grade, she went to the first Bais Yaakov school in Yerushalayim. One of the teachers was Chava Landsberg, a student of Sarah Schenirer. They were approximately forty girls and only three girls remained frum. "If I tell you their names, you will tremble ... daughters of roshei yeshiva, daughters of Rebbes, all went off the derech completely. All of my friends and neighbors joined the movements of the Haganah, Etzel, Brit Chashmonaim and Beitar, singing patriotic songs and going to meetings. The bachurim too joined the Haganah. I would see boys in the streets, without hats, with guns, and then I would recognize them as bachurim from Yeshiva Eitz Chaim.
"Some of the youth left because of the extreme poverty, but many left because of their chinuch. In some of these homes, the parents had come from Poland already influenced by the Bund. Their homes were not whole and the children went searching for what was missing. They wanted excitement, they wanted enthusiasm!
"My friends laughed at me and said that I was naïve, that I didn't know what was going on. I knew very well what was going on but I didn't ever want to go with them. I wasn't interested at all. There were many times I have asked myself why, why didn't I go?
"The only thing I can think of is that I had so much more at home. I was fulfilled; I wasn't missing anything."
*Baharan stands for Ben HaRav Nachum. Each of the five sons of Rav Nachum Shadiker (1810-1865) had a dream that they should move to Eretz Yisrael. Without knowing that the others had the same dream, each one packed to leave Poland. They all met at the boat and traveled together to Eretz Yisrael. They were known as the Baharan.
Labels:
chinuch,
Eretz Yisrael,
Family,
societal problems,
threat to Yiddishkeit
Nov 27, 2016
Nov 26, 2016
And Another Moshiach Fantasy
Another Moshiach fantasy I have (see here for the first one) is that all Jews will have a glowing yud on their foreheads and all Amalekites will have a black ayin. Lots of people with that yud will be surprised, sad to say, since so many Jews do not know they are Jews. This could be because they were never told and had no reason to think so, because they were raised by non-Jews, because they did not know that having a Jewish maternal great-grandmother, grandmother, mother makes them Jewish.
A smaller group of people, those who thought they were Jewish but aren't, and who won't have a yud, will be surprised too.
The precedent for my Moshiach fantasy is Bereishis 4:15 where Hashem engraves a letter of His name on Kayin's forehead. But I think this idea came to me from the Lights video here that I first saw 23 years ago on Chanuka. It tells the Chanuka story and uses flying, golden letters of the alef-beis to represent Torah-true Judaism and Greek letters that drop with a clang to represent the Hellenist philosophy.
Identity, who we are, who we belong to. That's the first step. Once we know who we are, then we find out what we need to do.
Nov 25, 2016
Sign of the Times?
My, oh my. An item in a Chinese auction booklet goes as follows:
It is called "Glow of a Gadol" and says:
"Thousands have basked in his light, and thousands more would pay anything to gain access to his wisdom and blessing. Choose one night of Chanukah to see Rav Chaim Kanievsky up close and personal for a transcendent experience of a lifetime. Touch the holiness and awe as you watch the Gadol Ha'dor light the Chanukah lecht with otherworldly kavanos and leave a changed man. Includes 2 round trip tickets."
Why is it that I cannot imagine a similar auction booklet entry for Rabbi Moshe Feinstein or Rabbi Yaakov Kamenetzky thirty years ago? Because it would have been unthinkable at the time. For one thing, Litvishe greats were not treated like celebrities or Admorim. For another thing ... do I really have to explain?
Nov 20, 2016
Gam Zu L'Tova
When you learn with someone who did not have a Jewish education, everything is new to them. All the stories you heard a hundred times are new for them.
One night, I told my learning partner the story of Nachum Ish Gamzu as related in the Gemara, how the jewels he was bringing to the emperor were exchanged for dirt by the thief of an innkeeper, and how it miraculously worked out for the best, gam zu l'tova.
The next day, I left the house and was a block away when I remembered that I left something important at home. I said, "This is not good." I continued on my way, hoping I'd manage without it.
It later occurred to me that saying, "This is not good" is the antithesis of "gam zu l'tova." Not only do I know about gam zu l'tova, I had taught about it the night before! So I told the person I had said it to, "I need to make a correction. I said, "This is not good, when I should have said gam zu l'tova."
We know lots of things but when it comes to integration, internalization, and what is instinctive to us, that's another story!
Oct 30, 2016
Taking a Tough Stance 2
Follow-up to this post: here
In the entertaining book, Ne Siyata D'Shmaya, the second to last story is about the author davening in a shul where bachurim were talking during kerias ha'Torah. He went over to them and gently told them it's forbidden to talk during kerias ha'Torah. They were silent for less than five minutes. He got up again and asked them to stop talking. They stopped for less than two minutes before resuming talking.
During the next Aliya he told them, the next time I hear you talking, I'm going to throw you out of shul. They looked at him scornfully, were quiet for a minute, then resumed talking.
He went behind them and grabbed the biggest bachur and shoved him out of shul.
Ten years later, he was back in that area and davened in that shul. He noticed a tall yungerman pacing the shul during kerias ha'Torah, ensuring there was no talking.
Unexpectedly, the man came over to him and shook his hand and hugged him. The author had no idea who he was. When davening was over, the young man said, "Ten years ago you threw a kid out of shul and he fell on a table and broke it. That kid was me and since then, I've been extremely careful never to speak a word during kerias ha'Torah. Plus, I make sure that no one in shul talks either."
So how long are parents, educators, and rabbis going to try the nicey-nice approach about derech eretz, tznius, decorum in shul, etc. without results before resorting to forcefully enforcing Shulchan Aruch and community standards?
Oct 25, 2016
The Real Deal
I was reading about a renowned artist and art forger who was arrested. At his trial, he asked, "I don't understand. Yesterday, this picture was worth millions of guilders, and experts and art lovers would come from all over the world and pay money to see it. Today, it is worth nothing and nobody would cross the street to see it for free. But the picture has not changed! So what's the difference?"
A witness at the trial said, "The magic has gone out of the picture. Like the first edition of a book, an original painting is part of history, a history that contains all of our dreams, our fears and our loves. A fake is ... a fake! No more, no less."
Do you understand this answer? I don't. Is there a better answer to the forger's question?
One answer is, "Forgeries are also wrong because they falsify history. The characteristics of a forgery accrue to the original artist. If we know that a painting is from the hand of Vermeer, we will see it in terms of what we know about the art of 17th century Netherlands; if we know that the work was by a forger working in 1936, we will be able to detect in it 20th century traces which were unnoticed before."
I can appreciate that. It's when people ooh and ah over a painting that they think is from a master and then scorn it when they learn it's a forgery, that seems silly to me.
A witness at the trial said, "The magic has gone out of the picture. Like the first edition of a book, an original painting is part of history, a history that contains all of our dreams, our fears and our loves. A fake is ... a fake! No more, no less."
Do you understand this answer? I don't. Is there a better answer to the forger's question?
One answer is, "Forgeries are also wrong because they falsify history. The characteristics of a forgery accrue to the original artist. If we know that a painting is from the hand of Vermeer, we will see it in terms of what we know about the art of 17th century Netherlands; if we know that the work was by a forger working in 1936, we will be able to detect in it 20th century traces which were unnoticed before."
I can appreciate that. It's when people ooh and ah over a painting that they think is from a master and then scorn it when they learn it's a forgery, that seems silly to me.
Oct 23, 2016
Unique Therapy
The following remarkable story was posted by Dr. Meir Wikler on matzav.com:
Every morning, in birchos hashachar, we thank Hashem for “preparing the footsteps of man” – hameichin mitzadei gaver. Every encounter we have throughout the day is preordained, and has a specific purpose and lesson. Often, we are oblivious to the Divine Plan and chalk these meetings up to simple happenstance.
Recently, however, I met someone who even I could see was dispatched from Above. In order to fully comprehend the import of our conversation, a bit of background information is necessary.
Approximately ten years ago, a well-respected mechanech who I had heard of but barely knew approached me in shul one day after davening.
“Dr. Wikler, may I speak with you in confidence?” he asked in an undertone.
“Of course,” I replied, feeling a bit flattered that someone of his stature would trust me with a personal matter.
He informed me that his wife had been suffering from chronic, debilitating depression for many years. They had tried psychotherapy, psychotropic medications, and even shock therapy – all to no avail. His wife was literally unable to function as a wife and mother, and he was at his wits’ end, searching for the tiniest ray of hope. Perhaps, he wondered, I might know of some alternative therapy that they had not yet tried.
Unfortunately, I was unable to suggest anything. All I could do was empathize with the man’s plight and wish his wife a refuah sheleimah. My feeling of helplessness lingered long after the conclusion of our brief exchange.
Recently, I learned about the impressive results of a new treatment for chronic depression called “TMS.” The next time I happened to see that mechanech, I was eager to approach him and inquire about his wife’s health, because now I did have a suggestion to offer.
“Shalom aleichem,” I began. “How is your wife feeling these days?”
“Oh, thank you for asking,” he replied, sincerely appreciative that I had remembered his predicament. “Baruch Hashem, she is doing much better now. In fact, for the past two years she has been more of a mother and a wife than ever before.”
I was delighted to hear the good news. “That’s wonderful,” I said. “Please tell me what miraculous treatment you found.”
“You want to know the truth?” he whispered, leaning in closer to me to ensure that the conversation would not be overheard. “I was the therapy.”
Now my curiosity was really piqued. “What do you mean?”
He then went on to explain that since his marriage, he had not been a very good husband. He had been overbearing, short-tempered, and critical, and had routinely demeaned his wife. As he put it, “It was my way or the highway. I was the boss, and she had to do everything my way.”
Approximately two years ago, this mechanech did some serious soul searching, which, combined with a few heart-to-heart consultations with his personal rebbi, produced a dramatic turnaround. “A paradigm shift,” as he put it to me.
His behavioral changes had a gradual but profoundly positive impact on his wife’s chronic depression. She began to steadily improve in her functioning as both a wife and a mother. For instance, before the turnaround two years ago, she was resentful and even disparaging of her husband’s public shiurim. “Again you’re speaking?” she would ask disdainfully.
Last week, the husband was invited to deliver a shiur on Shabbos afternoon. His wife volunteered to accompany him on his walk to the shiur. And when he came home, she proudly and enthusiastically inquired how it went, how many men showed up, etc.
My clients would be legitimately horrified at the thought that I might publicize any private matter they shared with me in confidence, even if I didn’t use their name. To assuage their concerns, therefore, I will close with the final words this man shared with me before we parted.
“As you can imagine, it was not easy for me to acknowledge that I was the cause of my wife’s depression all of these years. And, quite honestly, I was uncomfortable sharing this with you. I did so, however, because I hope that someday you’ll write up my story and publish it. You see, I may not be the only husband who is mistreating his wife and causing her to be depressed. And if even one other person will learn from my example, it will go a long way toward mitigating some of the damage I caused.”
I left that brief encounter with deep admiration and respect for this courageous mechanech. It takes tremendous honesty and incredible strength of character to take charge of one’s middos the way he did. I was also left with a heightened awareness of the Hashgachah pratis involved in such “chance” encounters, and with a firm resolve to fulfill the man’s wish that I publicize his story.
Which I just did.
{Matzav.com}
Labels:
Dr. Meir Wikler,
marriage,
psychiatry,
shalom bayis
Oct 22, 2016
Taking a Tough Stance
There is an extraordinary, first person, true story told here. I don't want to retell it in my own words when you can hear it directly from a person who was there, so I hope you will watch it. I will just say it has to do with a person telling someone off in blunt terms and how this had a positive outcome.
It occurred to me that if the approach would have been non-confrontational and tolerant, as other people handled it, then we wouldn't have much of a story. In this case, being judgmental (gasp) had a marvelous outcome.
I read an article about a kindly rabbi who spent hours counseling people and making calls on their behalf. Most followed his advice but there were some who were nudniks who went to him time after time, sharing their woes, but never following up on his suggestions. One time, a fellow in his 20's who had dropped out of college (although he received a scholarship), did not hold a job, and mostly spent his days in bed, despite repeated encouragement and advice from the rabbi, went to the rabbi yet again. The rabbi snapped and told him off. The fellow ran out. The rabbi was devastated by what he did. He tried contacting the young man without success and was told he left town. The rabbi thought of worst case scenarios and castigated himself for losing his temper.
Years later, the young man stopped him on the street and thanked him! The rabbi was bowled over by their chance encounter and how the young man looked marvelous and wondered why the man wasn't furious with him. The rabbi apologized for his behavior and said he had been searching for him to ask forgiveness.
The young man was shocked by this and said he made it in life because the rabbi had shaken him up. Nobody had spoken to him that way before and this is what helped him, not all the kindness and sympathy for his nebech plight. And he said that the rabbi had also said positive and encouraging things even as he yelled at him, and he realized that it was all true (albeit painful) and that the rabbi cared about him. The young man had gone to yeshiva, opened a business, and married and was living a purposeful life.
So when to be soft and when to be tough, that is the question!
Oct 19, 2016
Follow-Up Post
In connection with a recent post, here, it occurred to me as I was listening to his talk that he probably doesn't "go for" the 12 Step program. He did not say anything about it, so this is just me surmising.
As someone recently put it to me, they like the 12 Step program but see that the people involved with it are perpetually focused on the same issue. And that is precisely why I think Rabbi Weinberger wouldn't like it. Because it keeps its practitioners perpetually in the basement, dealing with the same stuff forever. B'shitta (on principle), 12 Steps does not allow you to "go up" to a different floor.
As Rabbi Wallerstein puts it, Judaism believes in teshuva. You do teshuva and you move on. You can't call yourself "a 30 years recovered addict." If you stop drinking you are a new person. The Zohar says if you do teshuva, you are a briya chadasha (new entity). You're not a recovering treif-food-eater, or recovering mechalel Shabbos.
Oct 14, 2016
To Listen to Doctors or Not
There are health situations that impact on mitzvah observance, such as fasting. The halacha is that what the doctor says, goes. This is adhered to by all Torah observant Jews, whether Litvish or Chassidish.
For example, there's the famous story about an epidemic in Lithuania and doctors said that nobody was allowed to fast. Most people were inclined to ignore this, since how could one eat on Yom Kippur? Realizing this, Rabbi Yisrael Salanter (founder of the Mussar movement) ate in shul in public on Yom Kippur. Seeing him eat on Yom Kippur, the masses went home to eat too.
As for a Chassidic proponent, the Lubavitcher Rebbe wrote to someone, "I object to your not meticulously obeying the doctor’s orders, as “Permission was granted the healer to heal.”
For example, there's the famous story about an epidemic in Lithuania and doctors said that nobody was allowed to fast. Most people were inclined to ignore this, since how could one eat on Yom Kippur? Realizing this, Rabbi Yisrael Salanter (founder of the Mussar movement) ate in shul in public on Yom Kippur. Seeing him eat on Yom Kippur, the masses went home to eat too.
As for a Chassidic proponent, the Lubavitcher Rebbe wrote to someone, "I object to your not meticulously obeying the doctor’s orders, as “Permission was granted the healer to heal.”
By granting this permission, healing becomes a mitzva on the part of the healer, as well as a notable and great mitzvah on the part of the individual being healed, [i.e.,] “You shall scrupulously guard your health”; “It is part of the service of G‑d to insure that one’s body is healthy and whole.”
With that introduction, I came across yet another example of a woman who disobeyed doctors' orders and went on to have a child or children. In this case, the woman died and was regarded admirably in her circles for having mesirus nefesh to bring children into the world.
I understand that sometimes, doctors tell a woman not to have more children only because, in their view, no women should have children after the age of 35. This is because it puts her into what the medical world considers a "high risk" category. If the woman has no health problems, then a medical directive like this is not one we would regard as a mitzvah to obey, and if there are any concerns, they are discussed with a rav.
But in a case where there is a specific reason for the doctor to be concerned about the mother's health, and she goes on to have children regardless, then even if she doesn't die as a result, is she a role model of mesirus nefesh for us? Or is she an example of someone who has transgressed the mitzvah of guarding her health?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

