Since, as of this writing, we still don't have the third Beis Ha'Mikdash, it's still timely to post a summary of some of the points various lecturers made recently about sinas chinam and unity.
R' Akiva Rutenberg - He said sinas chinam is apathy; I don't think so.
R' David Fohrman did an excellent 5 part video presentation here in which he maintains, based on the Kamtza-Bar Kamtza story, that sinas chinam is disproportionate anger. Not convinced that's what sinas chinam is.
R' Benzion Klatzko - He spoke bluntly about our lack of unity. Unlike many other speakers who extolled the unity of the Jewish people over the past two months, he says he doesn't see that the Sefardic-Ashkenazic, religious-secular, Chassidic-non-Chassidic divide has been bridged. He highlighted and praised the dozens of chesed organizations that we have but said he didn't see unity at the Siyum Ha'Shas, i.e. he did not see it bringing together all kinds of Jews.
I agree with him. So much chesed is done and it crosses lines, i.e. we don't only do chesed for our "own kind," but there still is very much that feeling of "us" and them." Who is us? Whatever group you affiliate with. And who is them? The other people out there. I wrote about it here
to be continued
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment